Dump Cathy

Congressperson Blames Beautiful MacKenzie's Attempted Suicide on Facebook's Censoring of Racist Defamation

3/27/2021 UPDATE - Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers: Today your immediate family member posted:

"Only in America can an ethnic group have Black Awareness Month, Black Holiday, Black-Only Colleges, Black-Only Dating Sites, and Black-Only Bars and Clubs and turn around and call everyone else racists."

You should sit down with your immediate family member and discuss the differences between race and ethnicity.

Also, it's Black History Month, not "Black Awareness Month" ("You know, black is really the absence of color...").

Also, there is no "Black Holiday". (Would that make 4th of July "White Holiday"? Or is that Christmas?) Presumably your immediate family member is referencing Martin Luther King Jr. Day, although the relatively simple concept of that holiday appears to be not quite understood.

Also, there are no "black-only" colleges, dating sites, or bars. You could use your pre-law knowledge to explain the public accommodation laws in this country to your immediate family member. Your beloved "religious discrimination" laws allow your immediate family member to openly discriminate only against black homosexuals, not all blacks (because of the shellfish and mixed-linen rules), and then, only under limited circumstances.

There are "black-only [private] clubs", just as there are white-only private clubs, as long as those private clubs have no entanglement with commerce. Back in January you tried to favorably compare your Donald to one of those white-only clubs - the Ku Klux Klan. But, no surprise, you misunderstood Brandenberg v. Ohio which was an example of well-behaved racist seditious fantasy, whereas your 1/6 insurrection party was real.

Also, not just African Americans think ignorant bigots engaging in racism are racists. People of all all backgrounds think ignorant bigots engaging in racism are racists.

UPDATE CONCLUSION: Good to see you have passed along the available resources to your immediate family member to remain at the topical forefront of the racial discussion on social media. We can see why you would be especially worried for your children that Big Tech would silence the conservative voice of your immediate family member and this thoughtful message about a series of incorrect things that any educated member of society would know. Racism is not inherited like race; it is learned. 

ORIGINAL POST:

Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers: We watched your recent garbled hostage videos.

Last week you were blaming teen suicide on the CDC. This week you are blaming teen suicide on social media.

None of what you say makes any sense to anyone -- unless one recognizes that you are 100% motivated by your obligations as a made member of the Trump Crime Family.

Your video blaming teen suicide on the CDC says you received a text message from a mom whose child apparently attempted suicide. "Beautiful MacKenzie", you called her in the video. Under no circumstances can we imagine texting our Congresswoman to report the attempted suicide of a child. This must be some kind of super-donor who texts you convenient personal tragedies to illustrate your trump-cultist talking points.

The best case scenario is that "beautiful MacKenzie", and the suicide text message, are apocryphal -- "Bette from Spokane"-style fabrications.

You have used fictional constituents in your stories before. "Armida" from north Spokane favored your tax bill, even using the GOP anti-Pelosi "crumb" talking point. But there is no Armida in north Spokane. "Eileen, Ashley and Julia" also loved your tax plan (borrowing money from China to give away to your donors), and you featured photos of "them" in a press release. Turns out "Eileen, Ashley and Julia" are Ukrainian stock photo models -- easy to check in two minutes using a reverse image search. But, by all means, continue to use fake people to tell your stories, nitwit.

If in fact MacKenzie exists, which we doubt, you told the world about her attempted suicide that you learned about by text? What kind of monster does that? Did you consider whether this is a crime? A HIPPA violation? A violation of the trust of the mother and daughter? Did you get a release?

What could possibly be lower than outing the attempted suicide of a teenager? You have engaged in many mindless, unethical and criminal acts as our Congresswoman, but this may be the worst. Either you disrespected "beautiful MacKenzie" in the worst manner imaginable, or else you flat out lied to us, nitwit.

Maybe even lower is pimping out your own children to support the illogical retribution campaign of your criminal mob boss.

We saw your video this week with more stories of you receiving presumably apocryphal phone calls and texts about child suicide. How do these people get through to you?

We write you every week to inform you that you have an immediate family member who routinely posts racist defamation that is flagged by Facebook. Your immediate family member has recently posted fabricated, horrifying, race-baiting, quotes falsely-attributed to Kamala Harris, Michael Jordan, Denzel Washington, and Barack Obama.

Most recently, your immediate family member posted "Race only matters to racists, the rest of us care about character". What is it about the character of Michael Jordan, Denzel Washington, Kamala Harris, and Barack Obama that is so horrible that it forces your immediate family member to fabricate outrageous, race-baiting quotes to falsely attribute to them? Your immediate family member must really care about character!

Our point is, why do you listen to these apparent calls and texts about teen suicide, but you appear not to care about our reports to you that your immediate family member is aggressively posting racist defamation and other memes regularly posted by uninformed ignorant bigots?

Don't you care when a constituent is trying to help you to stop looking like a nitwit?

Here is the breakdown of the assistance we are trying to provide:

1. Congresswoman, you have an immediate family member who is regularly posting racist defamation that is flagged by Facebook.

2. Your public position against flagging of posts by social media makes it appear that you are advocating for your immediate family member to post racist defamation.

3. Your immediate family member likely is under the impression that the racist defamation is true and that posting the racist defamation is helpful to you, the Congresswoman.

4.  Your immediate family member lacks the education, common sense, curiosity, and ability to verify if the racist defamation is true. For example, the "Barry Soetoro foreign student ID card" photo your immediate family member posted was actually taken from the Snopes article demonstrating the ID card as "false". You're not the only nitwit in your family.

5.  Amplification of racist defamation by ignorant bigots like your immediate family member is part of the problem with your suggestion that 'conservative voices are being silenced'. Your position assumes that there are no ignorant bigots like your immediate family member posting racist defamation, but indeed, there are thousands of ignorant bigots like your immediate family member posting racist defamation. Those conservative voices, the ones posting racist defamation, do indeed need to be silenced.

6. Social media companies have contracts with users prohibiting posting of objective untruths and racist defamation. Those contracts allow the social media company to flag or remove the type of racist defamation posted by your immediate family member. Facebook, for example, regularly flags the racist defamation posted by your immediate family member. From what we can tell, your immediate family member leaves the flagged posts up, instead of investigating why the post was flagged and removing the racist defamation as the law would require.

7. Your immediate family member has civil liability to the victims of the racist defamation. Just like you would have against us if we posted racist defamation about you. Maybe your immediate family member has an umbrella insurance policy or a reserve to answer in civil damages for the posted racist defamation.

8. As part of you carrying water for The Donald, you urge the repeal of Section 230. If that happened, then Facebook, as well as your immediate family member, would have civil liability for the racist defamation posted by your immediate family member. But under those user contracts, the user who creates the liability has the obligation to "indemnify" Facebook for any damages Facebook suffers because of its users' violations of its terms of service, such as the posting of racist defamation by your immediate family member. Maybe your family member has access to the campaign cash you didn't use while using our tax dollars unethically to fund your campaign, as you confessed, but did not publicize.

9. But we doubt your immediate family member has any ability to answer in civil liability for the racist defamation, especially to indemnify Facebook. Your immediate family member is highly irresponsible to post racist defamation with no ability to pay the true cost of doing so. Real republicans care about responsibility, they wouldn't post racist defamation, and then expect society to pay the costs. Sounds like socialism, Congresswoman.

10. And here you are using our tax dollars to ask Congress to make it easier for your immediate family member (and your crime boss) to post racist defamation while pretending you are concerned for your children.

Your concern for children seems spotty, though, since you did nothing when one of your supporters loaned his AR-15 to his child, to take on a federally-funded school bus, on a federally-funded road, to a federally-funded school, in your District, to slaughter other children. You did nothing. Nothing.

Children slaughtering children with weapons of war is fine with you, but you are worried that your child will be affected by seeing a flag on racist defamation posted by your immediate family member? You're a nitwit. Nitwit.

You continue to carry the water for a criminal mob boss -- to the point you've embarrassed yourself, your family, your party, your District, and your state. Twitter banned your orange messiah and rightly so. He yelled "repeal section 230" without understanding what that meant because he thought it would provide retribution.

So here you are this week pretending that it harms your children that social media wants to enforce its own contracts to ban racist defamation and the types of untruths amplified by uninformed ignorant bigots like your immediate family member. Flagging posts is not "silencing conservative voices" -- it is enforcing a contract. Republicans are usually for enforcing contracts, but you can't take this position because you are forced to carry water for The Donald, your crime boss. 

Those contacts require indemnity -- so even if you "repeal section 230", the social media companies would seek recourse from the poster who created the liability. Can your immediate family member answer for the racist defamation posted? Didn't think so. Your entire "repeal section 230" argument is absurd.

Two years ago, you won a made-up social media award that you were "honored" and "humbled" to receive, telling us how you were dedicated to using social media to connect with constituents (as long as the constituent fits your narrative like "my son pretended to commit suicide" and not "your immediate family member routinely posts racist defamation flagged by Facebook").

But now, you've "lost trust" in social media and are ready to eschew it entirely because you continue to carry water for The Donald, a lying philandering tax-cheating criminal mob boss. We see you pretending social media cannot help you communicate with constituents, because you have to carry The Donald's water. Seems you're pretty sloppy at it. You got some on your dress there.

We've lost trust in you. Our Congresswoman is willing to use our tax dollars to make bad decisions because they advance the personal retribution agenda of her criminal mob boss, and also advance the racist defamation agenda of your immediate family member. You are truly a joke - a pitiful amoral nitwit.

If your staff is keeping track, put us down as FOR our Congresswoman making videos blaming fake teen suicide on Facebook's flagging of racist defamation posted by the Congresswoman's immediate family member, because that irony is hilarious; but AGAINST telling the world about the attempted suicide of teenage "beautiful MacKenzie" without her permission; or, assuming the MacKenzie story is too horrifying to be true, AGAINST our Congresswoman continuing to use fabricated females with apocryphal stories that match the dark agenda of retribution of her criminal mob boss.

Have a nice day!

Congressperson Advocates For Racist Defamation Posted By Her Immediate Family Member

Dear Rep. McMorris Rodgers: Loved the lecture you posted today about "censorship of constitutionally protected content". Your analogy comparing communist China's treatment of the Uyghurs to Facebook's censorship of the racist defamation regularly posted by your immediate family member was food for thought.

We have previously alerted you about your immediate family member's regular racist defamation using the "Contact Cathy" link on your website, but our alert was apparently ignored. Or maybe you want to be known as the Congresswoman with the immediate family member who regularly posts racist defamation. Your trump-cultists likely love racist defamation posted by immediate family members of Congresswomen.

But, as your constituents, we are surprised that you would advocate against social media censorship at the same time your immediate family member is directly violating private social media terms of service by regularly posting racist defamation. It detracts from the finer points of your propaganda about the dangers of communism.

For example, last week your immediate family member posted "My rich great-grandfather Hamilton Brown owned 5 plantations and 200 Irish and African slaves, including men, women, and children," attributing the quote to Vice President Harris. Hamilton Brown died in 1843. None of his great grandchildren lived to be, or to coexist with, Vice President Harris. Facebook put a warning on your immediate family member's racist defamation, but your immediate family member kept the post up, presumably to honor your crusade for racist defamation.

Another example, this week your immediate family member posted "I hope every man in America never forgets that Kamala Harris slept her way to the top with a married man." Again, this awesome message of unity and racist defamation is diluted by your orange messiah. Your criminal mob boss took a corporate tax deduction for hush money paid to silence his sex-working copulation partner while his wife was at home with their infant son - a move you supported. So, while I want to remember your immediate family member's warning about Vice President Harris, I want you to remember about your tangerine dream and his familial, carnal, and legal transgressions.

Another example, your immediate family member posted a fake quote attributed to Michael Jordan: "I walked away from the Democrats because they don't stand proudly with their President. Anyone who disrespects him disrespects us all." Totally and completely untrue.

Another example, your immediate family member posted a fake "Columbia University Foreign Student ID Card" of a "Barry Soetoro" with a photograph of a young Barack Obama. Most informed people know this is untrue, but your uninformed immediate family member appears not to. Reminds us of your quote on the capitol steps that you "wanted to see the documentation" about President Obama's birth certificate. (We feel the same way about your supposed (1988?) (1990?) "graduation" from "high school". Or how you were accepted into the UW EMBA program (not the MBA program as you have claimed in official campaign documents) without an accredited undergraduate degree as the UW requires.)

Each example of your immediate family member's defamatory posts is about a successful African American. It is possible this is a coincidence, and that your immediate family member will start defaming other ethnicities soon. Or, more likely, your immediate family member is a racist, although your immediately family member would probably prefer to be called a Christian, like you prefer to be called.

All of these fake quotes and fake documents are defamatory. They expose your immediate family member to civil liability. It is unlikely any of these defamed successful African Americans will take the time and trouble to exercise their legal rights to come to the Eastern District of Washington to sue your immediate family member to enjoin the racist defamation and to seek compensation for it - but they could, and they should.

Many of your immediate family member's racist defamatory posts have laudatory comments from your immediate family member's circle of like-minded citizens. Comments like "For sure!" "Absolutely!" and "Same here cuz!" Your immediate family member has responded to some of these comments. We like this reply by your immediate family member for its trump-cultian racist article use - see if you can spot it: "Seems the blacks are demanding reparations for how many generations back?" Love the the! 

You have advocated for elimination of the safe harbor of Section 230, and that would expose Facebook directly to liability for this racist defamation posted by your immediate family member. Then your immediate family member would have to indemnify Facebook under its terms of service. Would your immediate family member be able to pay that indemnity? If not, it seems irresponsible for your immediate family member to put Facebook in that position by recklessly using the Facebook platform to post the racist defamation.

Then you come in. Today, you're on OAN advocating that Facebook be forced to re-publish your immediate family member's racist defamation. Love how you use the communism allegations to hide your own agenda of helping your immediate family member continue to publicly post racist defamation.

You would probably be more palatable to thinking people if you were able to curb your immediate family member from posting racist defamation before launching a campaign to force social media to post racist defamation from any trump-cultist, whether they are your immediate family member or not.

The bottom line is that you have an uncontrollable family member engaged in regular, systematic racist defamation, and you do not seem to care. That is too bad, because your own reputation, from James Alsup and Matt Shea and Jim West and your puppet masters at House GOP, is that you are racist-tolerant. You spent our tax money to hire a lawyer to write an amicus to cancel African American votes. You relied on a mis-reading of a Ku Klux Klan case to support your vote against impeachment. What a dope!

The Ku Klux Klan case is an apt example why you should admit you are unqualified to be a Congressperson and should resign. You cited Brandenberg v, Ohio to support your vote for the insurrection.

In Brandenberg, the KKK was exonerated for its private 13-person cross burning ceremony where the KKK discussed a march on the capitol -- because the KKK didn't then march on the capitol. In Brandenberg, the Supreme Court blessed the 13-person hate-drenched cross burning because it was all talk. But your armed racist Christian homeschooled COVID-breathing trump-cultist cousin-brothers stormed your building to disrupt the vote you wanted disrupted.

In other words, the KKK was "better behaved" constitutionally than your uninformed armed trump-cultists were. You do not even understand this "nuance" about Brandenberg that any first year law student would understand. Brandenberg supports polite racists like the KKK, not virulent racists like your uninformed armed trump-cultists. You're a dope to think the KKK case helps your cause -- and you relied on your mis-interpretation of Brandenberg to support your vote for the insurrection. What a dope!

First you argue for your right to misinform your constituents that the KKK case supports you. Now, here you are advocating with pride for the right of your immediate family member to post racist defamation. What a dope!

We are done being polite to the blank wall that is our Congresswoman. You are entirely unqualified for your job. You are a danger to society.

If your staff is keeping track, put us down as FOR having a Congresswoman who advocates for racist defamation while at the same time having an immediate family member who routinely posts racist defamation, because that is hilarious irony lost on our Congresswoman who lacks the sophistication to appreciate it, but put us down as AGAINST our Congresswoman improperly claiming that the Supreme Court has entitled President Trump to the protections it afforded to the Ku Klux Klan for hosting a 13-person cross burning discussing insurrection, because former President's behavior was more criminal than the Ku Klux Klan's.

Please for the love of all that is good, talk to your immediate family member. Stop the racist defamation in your own family before claiming conservatives are unfairly targeted for censorship.

Have a nice day!

FEBRUARY 26, 20201 UPDATE: The day after our article posted, your immediate family member posted new, racist (non-defamatory) racism. "We can't blame every Islamic Person for what happened on 9/11. Yep. Can't keep blaming slavery and racism on every white person."

"Islamic person"? Doesn't have the brevity of "the blacks", but equally as ignorant.

And just last week, your immediate family member was directly blaming Vice President Harris for slavery by defaming her with the made up quote: "My great-grandfather Hamilton Brown owned 300 slaves..." So, your immediate family member only wants to blame African Americans for slavery?

We can in fact "blame racism" on some white people - the racists. It appears that your immediate family member has earned the badge that your immediate family member acknowledges not every white person has earned.

March 9 UPDATE: Your immediate family member has posted a photograph of Denzel Washington, ascribing this fake quote to him: "Wait. Tell me again why I'm supposed to vote dem, when their promises are never kept? Do they think I'm stupid?" Mr. Washington apparently sees no humor in defamation.

Yesterday, your immediate family member posted: "Race only matters to racists. The rest of us care about character."

Your character-checking immediate family member has defamed Denzel Washington, Michael Jordan, Barack Obama, and Kamala Harris. This seems like a problem for you, Congresswoman. Too bad you don't care.